Everything shimmers as one with the liveliness of Impermanence.
AKA Indra's Net
Text by grs
rev 2024.10.19
image by grs with Google AI Gemini Pro 1.5
Rev 2024.01.17
Shimmer
No Lotus, No Mud
Familiar Thich Nhat Hanh quote:
"No Mud, No Lotus"
But also TNH:
~No Lotus, No Mud~
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=schlgVvKoDk&t=228s
3 minutes 48 seconds into this 9-minute TNH video on non-duality 2020.xx
GS: Google AI generated image of lotus rotting back ito the lotus pond Mud.
InterBeing
(Sight, Sound, Touch, Taste, Smell, Mind);
Not just interconnection;
Not just interaction;
Not just interdependence.
We are not just separate entities interacting.
In Interbeing, in the only, unbounded,
impermanent, ever-evolving present moment,
there is already no separateness.
in distance or time.
We are distinct, but without separateness.
Understanding that we
we begin to realize the path
in ourselves and all others.
- imho gs
Sum of All Vectors
We are the evolutionary, statistical sum of all vectors.
How could it be otherwise?
We are not separate --
nor merely tenuously interconnected,
interrelated, interdependent.
Separateness is a painful delusion,
like tiny islands forgetting
they are gigantic mountains whose peaks
just happen to barely peek above the water.
Mountains, whose tectonic roots
extend into the mantle,
that floats on Earth's molten core.
Just as Earth floats in an evolutionary, statistical sum of all vectors,
We inter-are.
How could it be otherwise?
-- GS 2022.06.22
Apologies to Richard Feynman, Stephen Hawkins, Thich Nhat Hanh, Gil Fronsdal, Charles Darwin.
Fronsdal translation of the opening verse of The Dhammapada
"All experience is preceded by mind,
led by mind, made by mind ..."
Multiple-Model-Dependent Realism
Stephen Hawking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_mechanics
Essential Workers
Nature's Roomba and a Sleepy Time Machine
Mindfulness of Ice
heedlessly into my ingrained memory of
a lifetime of previous uneventful steps,
i slip and fall on the ice
i was not present for.
- gs 2019.01.14
i'm OK :-)
H71B, LHBS
Love,
gary
2017.08.14
Belated Posting

Kitten Rescued in Crystal Plaza

Creating The Now We Need
So, in this new moment i will humbly try to help create the Now we all need;
Patiently observing the arising Outcomes, without clinging or aversion;
And continue trying to help create each new, needed, ever-changing Now.
-- gs 2009.04.02
Mindful Wave
Know that there is arising.
Who is arising?
Arise, mindful wave!
Absorb nearby momentums'
summing energies.
Arise, mindful wave!
Beware the heady self.
Take just what's given.
Abide, mindful wave!
Know that there is abiding.
Who is abiding?
Abide, mindful wave!
Experience follows mind,
Led and made by mind.¹
Abide, mindful wave!
Breathe. See clearly. Know what is.
Let go to be free.
Engage, mindful wave!
Know that there is engaging.
Who engages whom?
Engage, mindful wave!
Shaped by and gently shaping
Vast contingent seas.
Engage, mindful wave!
In high swells or flat water,
Be what's needed Now.
Abate, mindful wave.
Know that there is abating.
Who is abating?
Abate, mindful wave.
Pass on your life's momentums'
Lasting legacies.
Abate, mindful wave.
Profound equanimity.
- gs 2008.09.03/2008.10.12
See Mindfulness Metaphor - Wave - gs 2006.06.11
¹ This verse draws from opening verses 1-2 of The Dhammapada,
as translated by Gil Fronsdal:
"All experience is preceded by mind, Led by mind, Made by mind."
Related Reading :
The Dhammapada: A New Translation of the Buddhist Classic With Annotations Translated & Annotated by Gil Fronsdal, with forward by Jack Kornfield |
My Scion xB -- The Saga
Chapter 2 - Rude Awakening
Dec 4, 2008, i woke up to find that my 2004 Scion xB had been stolen -- leaving only a pile of glass from the left passenger window in my parking space. It was one of the rare nights that i had not used my club-style steering wheel lock. I got a free unlimited mileage rental car and waited 21-days for State Farm to declare the car "unrecovered". January 5, State Farm declared the car unrecovered - total loss -- and using NADA prices, they paid us only $500 less that what we bought it for 13 months ago.
Chapter 3 - Deja Vu, xB [image coming]
Dec 25, 2008. It turns out my Dad's electric wheelchair will not fit in the Honda Fit -- we actually tried loading the wheelchair into Eliot's Honda Fit (last year, i had used just the wheelchair's measurements, not the actual wheelchair). There is plenty of room inside the Fit, but the hatch opening is just a bit too small and the wheelchair can't be tilted for loading the way i thought it could. So that left the tried and true Scion xB, but CarMax didn't have any local xBs with automatic transmission. Amazingly, after 9 pm Dec 25, CarMax Dulles, VA posted a 2006 Scion xB automatic. So from the CarMax web site i reserved a test drive at Dulles early Friday Dec 26 and Linda came, too. That 2006 Scion xB is every bit as nice as my old 2004, with a better radio (with auxiliary input jack on the console for an XM Radio or MP3 Player, etc) and only 26,000 miles (vice 80,000 on my 2004). So we bought it right on the spot -- the sticker price was $400 lower than the CarMax web site price. Laurel CarMax will "repair" the front windshield due to a crack in the driver's field of view, found during the delivery inspection.
Chapter 1 - Finding The Perfect Fit
Dec 15, 2007 (Continued): Somehow, Karrin,
Dec 29, 2007 (Continued): CarMax Laurel replaced the rear-window under the 30-day warranty, but i had to bring it back to fix a leak in the window seal. They also replaced the entire rear window wiper arm (including a new wiper blade) under the 30-day warranty. The wiper arm/blade unit is a Toyota/Scion proprietary design -- so you can't buy a replacement wiper blade anywhere. A Toyota/Scion original part replacement blade is $60 (vice $15 for a standard wiper blade). So far, this is the only aspect of my 2004 Scion xB that is not wonderful.
Lara Logan - Our unflinching eyes on war
youtube.com/watch?v=zh2A_SYuhls
and all the other Lara Logan clips on YouTube going back for a long time.
Heat Advisory June 8, 2008
Into unexpected heat;
Fogged my glasses.
- gs June 8, 2008
Act Local, Save Global

Check out my list of opportunities to take personal action locally to save world civilization -- really !
My Photos of Free Burma Rally DC 2007.09.28

More photos at http://tinyurl.com/2our59
Choose SLIDESHOW (upper left) OR click selected photos. Download photos with Picassa program OR use right-mouse click to SAVE selected photos (lower resolution).
Cheesy Flies
-gs 2007.07.29
Fountain of Youth
From which they say youth springs.
I think, one might, to find it,
Begin again to notice little things.
-gs 1964
///
How did i forget that for so long?
-gs 2014
Anger & hatred aren't the answer either

These are the offending bumper stickers ... Click image to enlarge

Of course i'm pleased that someone noticed -- who was even provoked to thought and comment by -- my intentionally pithy yet civil bumper stickers, many of which i authored.
But that disproportionately hateful reaction is exactly the kind of fear-fueled Assault on Reason that Al Gore writes about in his current book describing the fundamental human causes for -- and proposing some core human solutions for -- the precipitous decline in rational and civil public discourse and governance in America.
Yes, many -- but not all -- of Gore's examples are about the current very Un-Republican-like Bush administration. That is no surprise, given his own political perspective on that administration's very controversial unilateral actions leveraging unwarranted fears over ignored facts in order to take us into an unnecessary and costly war in Iraq. The Bush administration has raised many other serious constitutional questions relating to the loss of civil liberties, the separation of church and state, and others.
Surely, some Republican and Independent writers will soon, i hope, apply Gore's same critique to any uncivil and unreasoning far-out wings of Democratic Partisans, and any other irrational, hate-mongering zealots.
But is there anywhere any respectful, shared rational discussion trying to establish the actual facts of those matters and other important issues? Only rarely on TV, radio, and newspapers, and only recently beginning on the Internet and in all media only among very few elected leaders or superficial pundits, but not very much among us citizens who are supposedly governing this country through our representative democracy.
The logic of Gore's argument in The Assault on Reason is universal, because it is not about reasonable fact-based disagreements among partisans about particular issues, but about the very unreasonable ways we all, all too often, succumb to our worst human nature to collectively suppress reason and facts to try to gain emotional control of an issue for "our side" against "those others".
Moreover, there are many other non-political arenas, where the lack of shared commitment to rational discourse drastically impedes our finding solutions to important and urgent global problems that require fact-based consensus, such as the fight against AIDS, global poverty and poverty-based disease, genocide, gun violence, global warming, and yes -- the all too many constant, avoidable wars that kill and devastate so many millions of people.
Clearly war produces nothing worthwhile (much less freedom). War is just our civilization's all too frequent declaration of moral bankruptcy. Once commenced, war pursues its own agenda, enslaving everyone involved (including the so-called "masters of war") in its chain reaction of unremitting horror and senseless death. It is only peace (before or after war) that may bring about and sustain the conditions necessary for freedom. Even those who may argue that war is sometimes necessary to relieve intolerably inhumane circumstances, will acknowledge that initiating war is to be avoided at all costs less devastating than war itself -- and that war is the highest possible cost (in money, lives, morality and sanity). If we rationally did the math, we'd never go to war, because there are always less costly alternatives to war. It is our irrationality and impatience that goad us into war. This is not an argument against self-defense or mutual defense against an aggressor who has already initiated war against us -- but the objective must then be simply to end war by the least costly means that are effective, and continue hostilities only as needed to allow our survival and end the ever mounting carnage as quickly as possible, and not to perpetuate war for any other so-called "noble" purposes.
Drawing on the latest neuroscience, examples from history and recent events Gore explains why we frequently forget this rationally obvious understanding about war and other ill-advised policies. Fears, especially false fears that arise spontaneously as myths or that are manufactured and tailored to manipulate us, can suppress our ability to reason individually and together as a nation.
Meanwhile, the civil exercise of one's own individual reasonable freedom of speech in public, despite our constitutionally guaranteed rights, has always been a kind of personally risky freedom of navigation exercise, that is unfortunately constantly necessary to preserve that right (and all other rights) in the face of persistent uncivil intolerance or worse.
This rising tide of intolerance is extremely dangerous because it leads to repression of all of us by a small, extremely powerful ruling clique (masquerading as elected representatives of a "moral majority" -- which in reality is itself subtly disenfranchised), first within society, then ultimately by government, along the slippery slope from dysfunctional democracy to the inescapable depths of brutal tyranny.
Don Herbert; Mr. Wizard Of Children's Television
"Don Herbert, 89, who as television's Mr. Wizard was for many years one of the nation's foremost popularizers of science, particularly noted for his ability to attract, inspire and hold the interest of children, died June 11 at his home in the Los Angeles area." Obituary (Washington Post June 13, 2007)
Thank you, Mr. Wizard, for many an inspiring Saturday morning.
GS
Brasso
Both clever and bold,
Who made crowns of brass not of gold.
Archimedes found out,
and gave out with a shout.
Eureka!, this crown's been Brasso'd.
- Winning entry submitted by GS to a monthly Brasso advertising jingle contest announced in the Army Times newspaper, in 1971 while stationed at Ft. Meade, Maryland, desperately awaiting ETS (expiration term of service) and return to civilian status. Truth to tell, i think every GI who sent in a jingle, got a "winning" $10 check from Brasso -- supporting the troops the old fashioned way -- with beer money.
In Defense of Wally
I offer the following in defense of Wally. From his point of view, he's not irresponsibly unproductive -- he's responsibly conserving his ability to surge, however rarely necessary that may be. Why, i mean, there was one late afternoon just last year when Wally ...
Be well,
Garold Out-at-Five Stone, retired federal bureaucrat & former cubicle denizen
PS: Your Out-at-Five motto helped keep me sane before i pulled the rip cord. Thanks.
Erroring On The Side of Compassion
If they are not an obvious fraud, I choose to err on the side of compassion by giving them a food gift certificate from a nearby restaurant -- McDonald's or whatever. I know certificates are converted easily into cash or traded for addictive substances, but that is an autonomous choice made by the recipient.
On a related subject, when I closely questioned the Prince George's Homeless Hotline (301-864-7140), they said that the rules they have been given to work under do not permit them to provide any services (and they have no other government or private social service referrals they can make) to "homeless" people who can not prove they have a PG County "home address." Let that sink in.
Then they told me that the D.C. Homeless Shelter (800-535-7252) will take anyone without any residence requirement (which I confirmed).
Of course, that is literally cold comfort this winter for those who find themselves "homeless" without a home address in Prince George's County.
Garold Stone
Laurel
Laurel Leader, Letters, January 26, 2007
Act Now to End the War January 27
Let's At Least Say Thanks
One way is at www.LetsSayThanks.com where a card with children's art and your message (selected from suggested wording or written by you) will be sent to military personnel overseas (not just in Iraq).

Thank you for your service, away from your home, family and friends, missing so many holidays, personal celebrations, and just being together -- I thank you for your personal sacrifice. I also thank you for your professionalism in such volatile circumstances. May you have good health, clarity of mind and the courage you need to be successful in the very difficult and often very dangerous mission that our country's leaders are giving you to accomplish. Please be safe over there and come back to us all very soon. -- Gary Stone, Laurel, MD
"What, then, are we to do?" (*)
What them?
Want them?
What end?
Want's end!
One tent.
Onement.
-gs
(*) This enduring question is asked in various ways in:
-- The Year of Living Dangerously (film),
-- What Shall We Do Then? Leo Tolstoy
-- Luke 3:10-11.
-- Lotus Sutra.
This form of morphemic transformation is familiar to many of us from our childhood as "the telephone game", except that in that game all we get is the original sentence and the final version -- the intermediate sentences are not revealed -- supposedly as a dramatic admonition to children against gossip and later in self-improvement seminars to demonstrate the poor results of trying to communicate unilaterally without feedback.
Here, I'm using an experimental technique that i'll call progressive morphemic transformation (PMT). I follow intuitively (not procedurally) a non-linear, possibly looping, path of small, incremental phonetic changes that reveal the morpheme-space contiguous to the morphemes in the original phrase and in the subsequently encountered phrases -- in hope of serendipitously discovering meaningful insights, without forcing a path to some predetermined target phrase.
i have no idea if this technique has any relationship to any other use of the term "morphemic transformation", but after a quick google search, i found that it is a "creative constraint" possibly akin to what is described in this Journal article by Colin Symes; Mosaic (Winnipeg), vol 32, 1999, Writing by Numbers: OuLiPo and the Creativity of Constraints
Coming to Our Senses: Healing Ourselves and the World Through Mindfulness
By Jon Kabat-Zinn
"Enemies" Don't Join You - Duh!
The logic is syllogistic in its simplicity and conclusiveness:
Parties grow by others joining.
Your "Enemies' don't join you.
Therefore, stop treating opponents as "Enemies".
... Duh !
This is not Pollyanna thinking -- It is Strategic!
Please consider my reasoning.
People bemoan the current "extreme polemics" of American politics -- Reds versus Blues -- each side looking for a slimmest possible majority, so it can slam-dunk legislation to impose its own uncompromising world views.
IMHO, neither the Democratic nor the Republican Party will ever again grow large enough to win enough elections to for very long occupy the White House, the Congress, install compatible Justices on the Supreme Court and throughout the judical system -- And cetainly Not IF we each continue to treat our opponents as "Enemies".
It is WE (our party, which ever that may be) who put THEM at that opposing pole, by not engaging them frankly and respectfully while defending and promoting our core personal values, even when they are acting in ways that do not "deserve" our respect. The concepts of "deserve" (good or ill), "should", "must" and even "compliment" and "reward" are fundamentally coercive, and thus ineffectual methods of persuasion.
Much worse, is when we make "enemies" of those who are not really very far from us along the political spectrum.
All that "enemy" making just triggers their individual and collective immune response. No one responds well to being told that they are "evil".
In the words of Korean Great Zen Master (Dae Soen Sa) Seung Sahn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seung_Sahn
"You make, You have." short for "You make problem, You have problem."
In this case: You make enemy, You have enemy.
Not until you think of them as your enemy are they really your enemy.
They are just people with differnet ideas -- maybe different ethics -- but not your own personal "enemy" unless you want to ban them and everyone like them Forever from your circle -- Enemies don't join. Where else will new joiners come from? Duh!
I am not arguing for the moral equivalence of all political views. I am arguing for the kind of human-to-human respect necessary to convince others to genuinely and voluntarily agree with us or find a livable compromise until we do find where we can agree.
And along the way, our opponents, treated not as our enemies, will let us get close enough to find more common ground on the really big issues where slam dunk majority legislation of uncompromising world views just makes matters worse for every one, immediately and in the long run.
A good book on this subject is Non-Violent Communication (2005) by Marshall Rosenberg.
Fishing Hookless
with no kind of hook at all.
Fish bites ----------------------------------------------- i tug.
Haiku Form & Formless
seven syllables and then
five more -- Haiku.
Mindfulness Metaphor - Wave
Shaped by and gently shaping
Vast contingent seas.
re: "The Jewish Mistress"
To: [My Friend]
Subject: re: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: "The Jewish Mistress"
Dear Friend,
It is always good to get email from you ... even when you are only forwarding a "joke" that just came to you over the internet (below).
Please let me share with you what came to my mind when i read it and why i feel strongly that it is not "just a joke". And, of course, i'd also like to hear what you think about it.
Why is it "a Jewish couple"? -- Why not simply "a wealthy couple", which they obviously are.
Why is it "The Jewish mistress"? -- In the joke, she is not identified as Jewish.
Why is it that the mutual friend has a Jewish name, "Morrey" [in another version he's "Moishe"]? -- Why not another name, such as "Joe".
This "joke" is seemingly innocuous -- but it is overtly anti-Semitic -- not to mention misogynistic. Every carefully crafted sentence plays on ages-old negative stereotypes of Jews. We all know those stereotypes and many of them are implied in that joke. Knowing that, we need to look inward and ask, "What devious trick has the hateful author of that joke played on us to make it seem funny to us, at first reading at least, even for us who do not hate Jews?"
Such hateful stories should be dying embers from the last Holocaust. Sadly, instead, they are kept glowing with each retelling -- and these days with each forwarded email -- until someday, adding their residual heat along with other seemingly innocuous but hateful ideas, they help ignite bolder flames of hateful action, which grow and spread until they explode into the next "Krystallnacht" and the next Holocaust.
The hateful author of that "joke" has "freedom of speech". But we each also have the freedom to choose to let such hateful embers die, by not spreading them farther. Or we can choose to pass them on so they can again immolate millions of people.
I choose life.
For a less metaphorical, more scientific explanation of the evolutionary spread of ideas (dangerous and beneficial), see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memetics
And for comparison with the anti-semitic joke below, here is a link to a "good" Jewish joke.
Be well, and Please Stay in Touch,
Gary
To: [Me]
From: [A Friend of My Friend]From: [A Friend of a Friend of My Friend]From: [A Friend of a Friend of a Friend of My Friend]
Subject: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: "The Jewish Mistress"
The wife glares at her husband and says, "Who was that?"
"Oh," the husband replies casually, "she's my mistress."
"That's the last straw," says the wife. "I've had enough! I want a divorce!"
"Well, I can understand that," replies her husband, "but remember this: if we get a divorce it will mean no more shopping trips to Paris, no more wintering in Barbados, no more summers in Tuscany, no more Jaguar in the garage and no more yacht club. So, the decision is yours."
Just then, a mutual friend enters the restaurant with a gorgeous babe on his arm. "Who's that woman with Morrey?" asks the wife.
"That's his mistress," says her husband.
"Ours is prettier," she says.
April 30th D.C. Rally To Stop Genocide in Darfur
The Rally to Stop Genocide will feature leading voices in the effort to stop the genocide in Darfur, including a broad spectrum of prominent faith leaders, political figures, human rights activists, celebrities, and survivors of genocide.
Take action: sign up today for the Rally to Stop Genocide.
Who, What, When Where?
Click here for the latest Rally Fact Sheet.
Confirmed Speakers and Entertainment
Because the Darfur genocide Crisis is spiraling out of control and spreading.
Directions to Rally
Directions for Bus Parking and Metro Transportation
Metro Directions
Map of Rally Area
Hotels
Printable Rally Flier
Suggested Sign Slogans
Information for Special Needs/Disabilities
MORE at www.savedarfur.org
Send Tony Blair a Christmas Card - End Poverty !!

to continue in 2006 to lead world-wide efforts to end global poverty.
http://www.makepovertyhistory.org/xmascard/
Voting is a fundamental right, not a mere privilege
Thanks for the excellently researched Dec. 2 article, "Voting machine opponents report notes election troubles."
In that article, a local election judge was quoted saying, "Voting is a privilege, not a right."
Voting is most certainly not a mere "privilege" -- it is the most fundamental right of each citizen in a democracy.
In the Maryland State Constitution, the Declaration of Rights, Article 7 states: "That the right of the people to participate in the legislature is the best security of liberty and the foundation of all free government; for this purpose, elections ought to be free and frequent; and every citizen having the qualifications prescribed by the constitution, ought to have the right of suffrage."
Those "prescriptions" are given in Maryland State Constitution Article 1 Elective Franchise, which states: "Every citizen of the United States, of the age of 18 years or upwards, who is a resident of the state as of the time for the closing of registration next preceding the election, shall be entitled to vote in the ward or election district in which he resides at all elections to be held in this state."
The constitution goes on to enumerate procedures for orderly registration to enable "the right of every person, thus registered, to vote."
The word "privilege" does not appear anywhere in the Maryland State Constitution relating to the voting franchise.
Any statement or action, intentional or inadvertent, which might downgrade our precious right to vote to a mere privilege must be resisted with every fiber of our being.
In such an alternate universe where voting would not be every citizen's right, who would decide who is privileged enough to vote?
The purpose of voter registration is to ensure free and fair elections in which all citizens exercise their fundamental right to vote.
When procedures for registration and voting are misconstrued by those in power as privilege-granting exercises, they serve only to prevent all citizens from voting.
Garold Stone, Laurel
So-called Intelligent Design is Not Science

It is, therefore, an egregiously evil breach of mutual repect, civility and the law for any one religious group (majority or miniority) to try to force its own religious views (mainstream or extreme) on the rest of society by trying to take control of government institutions or government-sponsored activities, such as public schools, which serve all Americans of all religious and non-religious beliefs. Such behavior is just plain selfish.
On December 20 the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania issued a ruling against the Dover [PA] Area School District policy of teaching so-called Intelligent Design in public school science classes and trying to discredit the scientific validity of evolution theory -- for religious reasons.
That ruling is a benchmark in our understanding and practice of the constitutionally mandated separation of church and state.
The court's Memorandum Opinion establishes legal precedent only in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. But it offers extensive fact finding and legal analysis (far beyond that quoted here) which will significantly inform any litigation elsewhere regarding any attempts to teach so-called Intelligent Design in public science classes.
This post provides two relatively short quotes from the court's full 139-page Memorandum Opinion, which fully and fairly characterize the ruling:
- The court's summary conclusions as to fact and law.
- The court's order.
Here is the court's conclusion (QUOTE):
The proper application of both the endorsement and Lemon tests to the facts of this case makes it abundantly clear that the Board’s ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause. In making this determination, we have addressed the seminal question of whether ID is science. We have concluded that it is not, and moreover that ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents.
Both Defendants and many of the leading proponents of ID make a bedrock assumption which is utterly false. Their presupposition is that evolutionary theory is antithetical to a belief in the existence of a supreme being and to religion in general. Repeatedly in this trial, Plaintiffs’ scientific experts testified that the theory of evolution represents good science, is overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific community, and that it in no way conflicts with, nor does it deny, the existence of a divine creator.
To be sure, Darwin’s theory of evolution is imperfect. However, the fact that a scientific theory cannot yet render an explanation on every point should not be used as a pretext to thrust an untestable alternative hypothesis grounded in religion into the science classroom or to misrepresent well-established scientific propositions.
The citizens of the Dover area were poorly served by the members of the Board who voted for the ID Policy. It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID Policy.
With that said, we do not question that many of the leading advocates of ID have bona fide and deeply held beliefs which drive their scholarly endeavors. Nor do we controvert that ID should continue to be studied, debated, and discussed. As stated, our conclusion today is that it is unconstitutional to teach ID as an alternative to evolution in a public school science classroom.
Those who disagree with our holding will likely mark it as the product of an activist judge. If so, they will have erred as this is manifestly not an activist Court. Rather, this case came to us as the result of the activism of an ill-informed faction on a school board, aided by a national public interest law firm eager to find a constitutional test case on ID, who in combination drove the Board to adopt an imprudent and ultimately unconstitutional policy. The breathtaking inanity of the Board’s decision is evident when considered against the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial. The students, parents, and teachers of the Dover Area School District deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources.
To preserve the separation of church and state mandated by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and Art. I, § 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, we will enter an order permanently enjoining Defendants from maintaining the ID Policy in any school within the Dover Area School District, from requiring teachers to denigrate or disparage the scientific theory of evolution, and from requiring teachers to refer to a religious, alternative theory known as ID. We will also issue a declaratory judgment that Plaintiffs’ rights under the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have been violated by Defendants’ actions.
Defendants’ actions in violation of Plaintiffs’ civil rights as guaranteed to them by the Constitution of the United States and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 subject Defendants to liability with respect to injunctive and declaratory relief, but also for nominal damages and the reasonable value of Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ services and costs incurred in vindicating Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights.
END QUOTE
Here is the court's order (QUOTE):
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. A declaratory judgment is hereby issued in favor of Plaintiffs pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 such that
Defendants’ ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause of the First
Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Art. I, § 3 of
the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, Defendants are permanently enjoined
from maintaining the ID Policy in any school within the Dover Area
School District.
3. Because Plaintiffs seek nominal damages, Plaintiffs shall file with the
Court and serve on Defendants, their claim for damages and a verified
statement of any fees and/or costs to which they claim entitlement.
Defendants shall have the right to object to any such fees and costs to
the extent provided in the applicable statutes and court rules.
END QUOTE
Sign of the Times

I'm told that there is another electronic sign at the Frederick, MD FREE STATE gas station, but that it didn't working very well when first installed.
Given the time it would have taken FREE STATE to decide to switch to new signs for its stations and design, manufacture and install them, the appearance of electronically changeable signs does not seem to be a direct consequence of the recent frequently changing gas prices due to gas shortages resulting from hurricane Katrina and Rita. But now it will certainly be more convenient to change prices than before.
It is interesting that the time-honored "9/10" cent, which is permanently painted on most gas price signs, is now also electronically changeable. Can "1/10" or "2/10" or even "1/5" cent gas prices be in our future?
For those interested in the technology, the numerals seem to be low power LEDs on a single-digit-at-a-time scan, as revealed by this photo taken at 1/1000 sec shutter speed to freeze the scan.

End AIDS March Through Laurel Nov 3

I walked with them for a few minutes and took pictures for their web site before returning to my lunch.
For more information about this kick-off event for a sustained campaign to once-and-for-all end the AIDS epidemic in the U.S. and around the world, and how you can participate, see http://c2ea.org
What's Wrong With This Picture?

All the more reason to check Laurel/Betlsville gas prices at this link or for any city at http://MarylandGasPrices.com with links to other sites for gas prices in other states.
A Day for Darfur Rally at White House Sep 8, 2005

What you can do right now to help.
Even though that day for calling the President has passed, you may still consider taking this simple action soon -- call the White House comment line (202) 456-1111 to leave a brief recorded message for President Bush -- the White House comment line opens at 9 am and closes around 4 or 5 pm Eastern Time.
The goal for "A Day for Darfur" was a lot of calls -- but please just do which ever you can.
Thanks for being the first world leader to declare one year ago, that what is taking place in Darfur is truly Genocide. But Genocide still continues there today, with over 400,000 killed, over 2 million displaced, thousands raped and most villages, crops and food supplies destroyed from burning by Sudan government troops and government-supported Janjuweed militias. Please take immediate action through the U.N. and NATO to send western forces to work jointly with the currently inadequate level of African Union peace-keeping troops in Darfur, with a mandate to use force to intervene to prevent this unrelenting genocide and other atrocities in Darfur. Please now declare "Never Again -- Not on My watch." Please personally lead a coalition of nations supporting a global "Culture of Life", to stop this Genocide in Darfur now.
Something like that, or whatever your heart leads you to say.
You can contact your U.S. Senators and Representatives, too, but the focus of "A Day for Darfur" was on raising this Darfur Genocide on the President's agenda -- to let him know that it matters to more and more Americans every day. The Holocaust in Europe ... Genocide in Armenia ... Kosovo ... Ruwanda ... and now Darfur. All Genocide must stop now.
Please pass this on as you may see fit, using this web link:
I'm keeping a public file of Darfur related news. To reach it on this BLOG click Topical Links then Darfur or you can bookmark/RSS http://www.blinklist.com/GaroldStone/Darfur/
http://www.blinklist.com/GaroldStone/action/
Marriage of Jesse Stone and Rachel McLaren
Slow School Zone Project Resumes
Montpelier Elementary School Cross-walk Safety Beacon Failed on First Day of School
Bush on Teaching Intelligent Design in Public Science Classes
the teaching of "Intelligent Design" in public school
science classes.
But, if the purpose of Skepticism is to achieve for
myself, and promote in others, respect for reason and
reasoned argument based on empirically demonstrable facts
and well-tested theory ... then it behooves me as a
Skeptic to be not only passionate in defense of reason,
but at all times a REASONABLE person (equivocation
intended) ... in public where it shows and in private
where it forms habits ... and at a minimum ... on my part,
to eschew ad hominem attacks on others, even when --
especially when -- seemingly well-justified anger and
frustration well up within me. Often i will fail in that
effort -- but i should continue to try.
Else, i believe, skepticism will lose (fail to reach?)
the ethical and rational high ground it presumes to be
defending, because others will see Skepticism (in my
practice of it) as just another venally partisan and
selfish "special interest group".
When i compare these two statements from an Aug 3
Washington Post article, it is clear which one is easy
for anyone to dismiss out of hand and which one genuinely
advances the argument against ID.
1) Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), a leading liberal
lawmaker. Noting Bush's Ivy League education, Frank
said, "People might cite George Bush as proof that
you can be totally impervious to the effects of
Harvard and Yale education." [such examples cover
the political spectrum, of course, and the intended
audience is usually the partisan choir]
2) Bush's comments were "irresponsible," said Barry W.
Lynn, executive director of Americans United for
Separation of Church and State. He said the president,
by suggesting that students hear two viewpoints,
"doesn't understand that one is a religious viewpoint
and one is a scientific viewpoint." Lynn said Bush
showed a "low level of understanding of science,"
adding that he worries that Bush's comments could be
followed by a directive to the Justice Department to
support legal efforts to change curricula.
I'm both encouraged and cautioned by this excerpt from
Surowieski's The Wisdom of Crowds, page 76 large print
edition (last page of Chapter 2):
"Ultimately, [expressed] diversity contributes not just
by adding different perspectives to the group but also by
making it easier for individuals to say what they really
think." ... "Having even one person in the group who
felt as they did made the subjects happy to announce their
thoughts, and the rate of conformity plummeted."
The President's highly visible statements have made it
much easier for more people to express and act
(legislatively and otherwise) on their beliefs in ID.
As a Skeptic i need to become more visible in supporting
the teaching of evolution vice ID in public school
science classes, so that others will feel more comfortable
expressing their support for the teaching of evolution
vice ID in public school science classes.
I know how to do this, conversation by conversation,
letter by letter, email by email. I just need to get busy.
Muirkirk Rd De Facto Extension of ICC
To read it, click here